Wednesday, July 31, 2013

Quake danger closes Wellington street

The Wellington City Council is working to restrain a quake-damaged lift shaft of a parking building which is feared could come down in an aftershock.
Council earthquake resilience manager Neville Brown says steel bracing was being put in to help keep the shaft on Lukes Lane in place and the area will be closed for several days.
The shaft was one of a number of structures damaged in Sunday's 6.5 magnitude earthquake.
Mr Brown says the council would do the work first "in the interest of public safety" and then talk to the building's owner afterward about the cost.
"We will count the cost when the crane comes down."
The shaft, which is on a lean, has forced the closure of some businesses while the work is completed and the council has also asked residents to evacuate.
"The reason we've evacuated the surrounding buildings is that we don't know how far it will fall, but if it did it would be in this direction. So we're kind of protecting a fall zone, rather than anything else."
"Most people were sensible and evacuated in light of the request, we can't order them to go, but we've strongly advocated that they move until the work is done."
Among the residents that have not left the area is Victoria university student Mark Lovelock.
Mr Lovelock and his flatmates live on the top floor of Trojan House, which is on Lukes Lane. He says his flat received an evacuation letter but they've decided to stay.

"This is our home, it's where we live, so we're going to ride it out. It's only going to take a few days."
Mr Lovelock and his flatmates are architects and building science majors so did their own calculations of how the shaft might fall.
"We did a bit of simple trigonometry and our landlord's office would get hit before ours, so we've decided to stay."
Downtown Community Ministry had only two-and-a-half hours to evacuate their office which is in the shadow of the lift shaft.
DCM director Stephanie McIntyre says the evacuation was used as a training exercise for a bigger disaster.
"What we're trying to do is prepare ourselves for the day when we don't even get back into the office in the first place and have to operate remotely from somewhere else."
"We want to be in a situation where we can, without missing a beat, can be open for services," she says.
Before evacuating, staff were given boxes to put their important things, but Ms McIntyre says there was a "long list" of things that had been forgotten.
Mr Brown says it was not the council's job to demolish the lift shaft because it is private property.
"[It's] up to the owner. Long-term he needs to make more permanent repairs, which may include demolition."
The work was being done on the advice of GNS Science to make sure the shaft is secured and does not cause damage, he said.
3 News
Online Reporter
Friday 26 Jul 2013 9:16a.m.

More info needed for fair trial - Dotcom lawyer

Kim Dotcom’s lawyer says more information is needed if his client is to get a fair hearing as he fights extradition to the United States on piracy charges.
Paul Davison QC today argued at the Supreme Court in Wellington that more documents were needed than just the cloned documents which were seized during a police raid on Dotcom's Coatesville mansion, including documents the prosecution believes are relevant to the case.
Dotcom’s legal team wants access to all information the United States government has against him.
Mr Davison says cloned copied of documents would provide access to the information, but would not meet Dotcom’s request for full discovery based on the volume of material.
Information that has been highlighted as important by the prosecution would be more valuable "so [Dotcom] doesn’t have to sift through everything to say 'they must be thinking this [document] is significant'", he says.
"The nature of the case shouldn’t dictate disclosure."

It is not a burden for the prosecution to supply the documents because the vast majority of them are digital, he says.
"Push a button. It’s nothing seriously much more than that. The idea that it’s onerous or burdensome doesn’t have much weight to it."
The Supreme Court appeal was made earlier this year after the Court of Appeal dismissed a District Court order - upheld by the High Court - that the US government must disclose the evidence it had against Dotcom and his co-accused.
The Court of Appeal found District Court Judge David Harvey’s decision was made wrongly and decided full disclosure was not required.
Dotcom and his three co-accused, Mathias Ortmann, Fin Batato and Bram Van der Kolk, are facing copyright infringement, money laundering and racketeering charges in the US over the Megaupload file-sharing site.
The hearing continues.
3 News
Online Reporter
Tuesday 30 Jul 2013 12:10p.m.

Mega accused allegation based on joke - lawyer Simon Wong 3 News Online Reporter


Tuesday 30 Jul 2013 5:35p.m.
0 Comments and 0 Reactions

An email exchange between two co-accused in the MegaUpload case and which the United States is using as evidence against them is a joke taken out of context, their lawyer says.
Guyon Foley, who is representing Kim Dotcom's co-accused Finn Batato, Mathias Ortmann and Bram van der Kolk, said that is one of the reasons he and Dotcom’s lawyer are asking for more information ahead of next year's extradition hearing.
"The United States, in terms of their application for surrender, is relying on a joke. We wish to demonstrate that," Mr Foley said.
A hearing in the Supreme Court today heard arguments for and against handing over more documents to the four who are accused of copyright infringement and racketeering in relation to the MegaUpload website.
Mr Foley said while his clients had access to some of those emails which were in a cloud storage system, more information would allow his clients to give context to the allegations.  
"There are a very large number of emails – about 5 million - that sounds like a lot to us, but I imagine you can put them on a small hard drive the size of a glass of water. That wouldn’t take long."
His clients and Dotcom wanted to "essentially to be able to prove to the extradition court that there is no case".
Meanwhile Solicitor-General Michael Heron QC said if disclosure was granted it would not be the end of the matter.

"Of course not. There will be arguments about what's disclosed, how much, what's been missed out.
"How will the court determine what's relevant? It will have to see it and we'll end up with everything being disclosed."
Mr Heron said the courts do not have the power to order documents to be handed over to the accused because it is contrary to New Zealand’s extradition treaty with the United States.
Mr Heron said there were no cases in common law where an order for disclosure was upheld. "Nowhere in the treaty does it contemplate the court ordering disclosure. There is no specific reference to that."
Earlier District Court Judge David Henry made an order for disclosure which required the United States government to disclose evidence it had against Dotcom and his co-accused.
The Supreme Court appeal was made earlier this year after the Court of Appeal dismissed Judge Harvey’s order and decided full disclosure was not needed.
Under the Extradition Act the United States must satisfy the District Court that Dotcom and his co-accused have a case to answer.
The Justices reserved their decision.
3 News

Inquiry into phone record release launched


Wednesday 31 Jul 2013 3:19p.m.
Parliament's Privileges Committee has launched an inquiry into the release of a journalist's phone and swipe card records.
Committee chair Chris Finlayson says the inquiry will get evidence from key figures including political journalist Andrea Vance, who was targeted by a ministerial inquiry.
The announcement of the inquiry comes after Speaker David Carter vowed to use his power to find out why three months' worth of Ms Vance's phone records were given to a ministerial inquiry aiming to find out who leaked the GCSB report.
The first public hearing will be held on August 21.
Meanwhile Prime Minister John Key has still not apologised for the phone records being handed over in what he says was a "mistake".
"It's not really my job to apologise for a mistake made by Parliamentary Services because they don't report to me.
"This is not something we've done wrong."

Green Party co-leader Russel Norman does not think it was plausible for an IT contractor to have collated Ms Vance's phone records without being asked to, as Mr Key has previously said they could have.
He says it is clear Parliamentary Services was pressured to hand over the phone records by the Prime Minister's office.
Mr Key's chief of staff Wayne Eagleson had no right to tell Parliamentary Services what to do in pressuring it to release the records, he says.
"Wayne Eagleson is John Key's right hand and as the Prime Minister of New Zealand he has no right to interfere into the business of Parliament.
"Otherwise we just live in some kind of dictatorship where John Key gets to tell us what to do all the time."
Mr Key says he would have no issue with Mr Eagleson being called before the inquiry.
"It was quite clear in a number of emails I've seen, that the information [sought in the David Henry inquiry] was about ministers and their staff and absolutely everyone would have understood that."
Labour leader David Shearer says the Privileges Committee inquiry is a "good step" and Mr Key and Mr Eagleson should front at the inquiry to come clean about what they know about the phone records.
3 News

The general manager of Parliamentary Services has resigned.


Speaker of the House David Carter confirmed he received the resignation of Geoff Thorn this morning.
"I have accepted his resignation with some regret, as during his tenure as General Manager, Mr Thorn has overseen a significant improvement to the operation of Parliamentary Service," Mr Carter says.

"However, both he and I acknowledge that the confidence in Parliamentary Service has been undermined by events in recent weeks, and as General Manager he accepts responsibility for this."
Mr Thorn's last day will be tomorrow. He will receive three months' salary and any entitlements he has owing to him.
The resignation follows a recent scandal involving the release of political journalist Andrea Vance's phone records and MP Peter Dunne to a ministerial inquiry into the leak of a GCSB report.
David Stevenson, currently the Group Manager, Precinct Services will step in as acting general manager role from 5pm Friday.
3 News
Online Reporter
Thursday 01 Aug 2013 3:37p.m.

Friday, July 26, 2013

Activists call for end to animal testing

Activists call for end to animal testing

Activists call for end to animal testing
Green MP Mojo Mathers holds the 13,000-signature petition and a dog (Simon Wong/ 3 News)

Green MP Mojo Mathers holds the 13,000-signature petition and a dog (Simon Wong/ 3 News)

Animal rights activists have handed in a 13,000-signature petition calling on parliament to stop animals being used to test cosmetics.
Green Party MP Mojo Mathers accepted the petition on parliament's forecourt this afternoon.
"Animal testing is the ugly underbelly of the beauty industry," she said.
"It is cruel, painful and completely unnecessary as there are modern, smart alternatives."
Ms Mathers says the European Union and India have banned animal testing for cosmetics.
"It's time for New Zealand to step up and end this unethical and cruel practice."

Representatives of the animal rights organisation SAFE and their supporters gathered on the forecourt to hand over the petition, some of them dressed as rabbits.
The petition will be sent to a select committee which will decide whether to recommend law changes.
Earlier this month Ms Mathers was unsuccessful in a bid to ban the use of animals for testing party pills.
New laws passed by parliament force the manufacturers of party pills, known as "legal highs", to prove their products are safe before they can be sold.
The law says animals can't be used if alternative methods are available.
Ms Mathers argued for a total ban but her proposed amendment was defeated.
ACT leader John Banks, who supported the amendment, told parliament during the debate on the bill that rabbits were used to test cosmetics because they couldn't blink.
NZN

Read more: http://www.3news.co.nz/Activists-call-for-end-to-animal-testing/tabid/1607/articleID/306333/Default.aspx#ixzz2aDeEVbiw

Wgtn student army calls for members

Wgtn student army calls for members

Wgtn student army calls for members
Earthquake damage on Featherston St, Wellington (Getty)

Earthquake damage on Featherston St, Wellington (Getty)

A Victoria University student has put out a call to arms in an attempt to mobilise students after Wellington's earthquakes.
First-year Law and Politics student Matt Harrington is one of several students who set up the Wellington Student Volunteer Army yesterday after seeing how successful the Christchurch equivalent was following the devastating Canterbury earthquakes.
The group's Facebook page has garnered more than 300 members since its creation last night.
It is asking businesses, homes and schools to get in contact with the group if they needed a hand cleaning up
Mr Harrington, originally from Christchurch, says the group's first job will be at Saatchi and Saatchi on Wednesday.
The group is looking to expand their efforts to Seddon – the Marlborough town closest to the epicentre of the swarm of earthquakes.
Mr Harrington says he thought of setting up the group after seeing how effective the Christchurch Student Volunteer Army was.
"It gives you an idea of how a community can pull together."
It is good to have the group set up in advance so members can be called on if a larger event were to happen, he says.
Anyone who would like to join the group or who needs help with cleaning up should go to the Wellington Student Army Facebook page or email wellingtonstudentarmy@gmail.com.

Wednesday, July 17, 2013

Friend recounts drug dealer's death

Online Reporter
A man has described how he tried in vain to save his friend, who collapsed on his driveway after being beaten and suffered a fatal heart attack.
Two men, Desmond Leaf, 30, and Harlem Rawiri Turi, 32, have been charged with manslaughter by assault following the death of small-time drug dealer Michael Mullholland on September 20 last year.
An alternate charge of injuring with intent to injure has also been laid and Turi has also been charged with robbery.  
The case, which began yesterday at the Wellington High Court, is being heard before Justice Robert Dobson and a jury.
Today, Sean Barclay recounted how Mr Mullholland managed to drive the short distance along Farmer Cres, Lower Hutt, to the property Mr Barclay was house-sitting.
Mr Mullholland collapsed shortly after reaching the house and had cuts and bruises around his eyes, Mr Barclay said. His mouth was also full of blood.
"He was gurgling hard. [He was] trying to tell me something, but nah. I had the phone on speaker and was telling them [emergency services] to hurry up."
Mr Barclay was told by emergency services to roll Mr Mullholland on his side and check his throat was clear, then put him on his back before starting chest compressions.
Crying was heard in the public gallery as Mr Barclay gave his evidence.
It took about eight minutes for an ambulance and the fire service to turn up to the scene and about 20 minutes for police to arrive, he said.
Earlier that day, Mr Barclay had gone to Mr Mullholland’s house to pick up some firewood and saw a number of cars and people at the house he did not recognise.
The Crown contends that Turi and Leaf, both patched Mongrel Mob members, beat Mr Mullholland over the sale of methamphetamine. Mr Mullholland managed to get into his nephew’s car and drive to Mr Barclay’s house around 10pm - only about 10 minutes after the assault is alleged to have happened.  
Mr Mullholland was known to sell cannabis, methamphetamine and his own prescription medicine. He had a heart condition, took painkillers for a foot injury and had previously had a heart attack in 2004.  
The trial is expected to last about two weeks.
3 News Tue, 16 Jul 2013 2:45p.m.

Hung jury in NZDF defamation case

Online Reporter
The jury in a defamation case against Chief of Defence Force Lieutenant General Rhys Jones has not been able to reach a verdict.
After more than five hours of deliberation, the group of seven men and five women were unable to decide whether the Defence Force and its head Lt Gen Rhys Jones defamed freelance journalist Jon Stephenson.
Justice Alan MacKenzie discharged the jury and thanked them for their work. 
Mr Stephenson sued the Defence Force and Lt Gen Jones for defamation and sought damages of $500,000.
Mr Stephenson wrote an article in Metro magazine in 2011 claiming Kiwi forces in Afghanistan were complicit in handing over detainees to authorities known to use torture.
Shortly after publication the Defence Force released a media statement saying parts of the story were untrue or inaccurate.
The Defence Force contended it had evidence Mr Stephenson did not gain entry to an Afghan crisis response unit base and interviewed its commander.
Outside the Wellington High Court Mr Stephenson said he was disappointed with the outcome, but was happy Lt Gen Jones conceded he did go to the Afghan crisis response unit base.
He did not rule out a retrial of the case or settling the matter outside court.
Mr Stephenson did not think Lt Gen Jones had an ill will towards him, but was rather “poorly advised” when the statement was released.
The jury retired to deliberate yesterday afternoon, but did not return their decision by the end of the day.
It had to decide whether Mr Stephenson had been defamed by the Defence Force. If they believed he did, the jury had to decide how much money Mr Stephenson should be awarded.
In closing statements yesterday, lawyer for the Defence Force Hugh Rennie QC said it merely stated "what it knew" about the interview at the time, which was not defamatory.
Mr Rennie said if he was wrong, then the money awarded should be no more than $10, Mr Rennie said.
Mr Stephenson's lawyer Davey Salmon said the case was not about money. Anyone questioning the credibility of a journalist "was like a dagger through the heart," he said.
Mr Salmon said he chose the $500,000 sum based on previous defamation cases – it was not an issue that was important to his client.
The case was heard over seven days and included evidence from Three unidentified serving SAS soldiers, Lt Gen Jones and Mr Stephenson.
3 News Thu, 18 Jul 2013 5:08p.m.

Monday, July 15, 2013

VIDEO: How to sport stack

Online Reporter
It's fast, it's furious and it's a sport you've probably never heard of.
Two Upper Hutt brothers Nicolas and Philip Kananghinis, 12 and 10 respectively, are making a name for themselves internationally in the world of sport stacking.
The sport requires competitors, both individuals and in teams, to stack a dozen specially designed cups in pre-determined sequences as quickly as possible.
Competitive times for stacking, depending on which sequence, are consistently less than six seconds.
The brothers hold the New Zealand and Asia records for doubles and have placed consistently as individuals in the top ten in the country since they started around three years ago.
"At school my teacher in Year 6 was an ambassador of the sport and he taught our class and then I went to the national competition and came third overall, surprisingly," Nicolas says.
"And then I just carried on and get better every day."
Since that first win, Nicolas placed fourth in the world for his age group at the World Sport Stacking Championship in Germany last year and 43rd overall.
At this year's world championship in Florida both brothers also placed in the top ten.
They say their brotherly rivalry is what keeps them competitive.
"There's no time I've ever really beaten him at stacking," Philip says before Nicolas interjects.
"He has for about two minutes, but then I beat it."
Sport stacking has also turned out to be a family affair with at least four of the brothers' younger siblings trying their hand at the sport, including their three-year-old sister.
Mum Jodie Kananghinis says she and husband Basil have also tried their hand at sport stacking too.
"It's fun to do and it's sort of addictive. You have your own time in your head and you try and beat that – [we're] nowhere near in the same league."
The brothers are fundraising to go to the next world championship tournament in South Korea in April next year, but they are yet to be picked in the national Black Stacks team.
3 News Mon, 15 Jul 2013 5:01p.m.

Friday, July 12, 2013

Angry birds invade Auckland

Online Reporter
A flock of angry birds are on the loose in Auckland and they're eluding bio-security officials.
The Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) says an unknown number red-vented bulbul have been spotted in Mangere, Devonport and possibly the Whangaparaoa Peninsula.
MPI Response Manager, Jaap Knegtmans says the species are "aggressive to other birds" and are regarded as one of the world's most invasive bird species.
The ministry is concerned the birds will establish themselves in Auckland which would affect the horticultural industry, native vegetation, other birdlife and private gardens.
It has teamed up with the Department of Conservation and the Auckland Council to track down and "eradicate" the birds. However, the ministry is also asking the public for help.
Mr Knegtmans has asked members of the public to contact the ministry and take photos of the birds if they see them.
The birds are around 20cm in length or about the size of a starling. They are generally dark coloured with a lighter chest and rump, a small crest on their head, and significantly, a very distinctive crimson-red patch beneath their tail.
Mr Knegtmans says the birds have invaded other parts of the Pacific, particularly Fiji and suburban Sydney. The ministry believes it’s likely they hitched a ride to New Zealand on a commercial vessel or a recreational yacht.
The birds were found in Auckland in the 1950s and also in 2006 and in both cases were eradicated.
"While they may appear cute, they’re anything but, and urgent action is required to locate and capture them before they establish," Mr Knegtmans says.
Anyone who has seen the birds should contact MPI on its free Exotic Pest and Disease Hotline 0800 80 99 66.
3 News Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:52a.m.

Army email revealed in defamation case

Online Reporter
An internal email from a top Defence Force Colonel suggests a statement denying a journalist interviewed an Afghan colonel was needed in order to damage the journalist's credibility and stop an inquiry into revelations he made.
Freelance journalist Jon Stephenson is taking the Defence Force and chief of defence Lieutenant General Rhys Jones to court alleging defamation.
The case began on Monday at the Wellington High Court before Justice Alan MacKenzie and a jury. It is expected to finish next week.
During cross-examination of Colonel Chris Parsons, Mr Stephenson’s lawyer Davey Salmon read an excerpt from an email exchange between Colonel Jim Blackwell, Col Parsons and others.
Part of an email from Col Blackwell read: "Get the statement saying he has not done an interview, get it witnessed by someone with credibility outside NZDF.
"The more that we can prove that [Jon Stephenson's] statements continue to be false, then the earlier we can stop parties requesting an inquiry."
However, Col Parsons said the email did not contain a command or order from Col Blackwell.
"So when he's saying we need to stop an inquiry, he is saying 'we want to reduce the credibility of Jon Stephenson's overall message by claiming he didn't go to the CRU base'," Mr Salmon proposed.
Col Parsons agreed the emails could be interpreted that way.
Mr Stephenson wrote a report in a 2011 edition of Metro magazine claiming the Defence Force was complicit in handing over detainees to Afghan authorities who later tortured the prisoners.
At the heart of the case is a small passage in the 12-page article which says Mr Stephenson visited the crisis response unit (CRU) base in Afghanistan and spoke to a man referred as "Colonel M".
Shortly after it was published, Lt Gen Jones and the Defence Force slammed the article, saying parts of the article were inaccurate or did not happen.
Among the Defence Force's accusations was a claim the interview with "Col M" was made up.
A senior member of the SAS, who also gave evidence yesterday, said it was "very doubtful" Mr Stephenson was allowed to access the CRU base; because of strict security measures.
Identified in court only as Lieutenant Colonel R, he said the CRU base had a strict policy about media access.
On Wednesday Lt Gen Jones, following evidence given by Mr Stephenson, conceded Mr Stephenson "probably" did go to the base and the person he spoke to could have been "Col M". However, Lt Col R did not agree with Lt Gen Jones’ view.
"I have first-hand knowledge of that base and that commander. I maintain my conclusion that visit did not occur."
He did not have any theories about who Mr Stephenson talked to at the base. Mr Stephenson said the man he interviewed, through an interpreter, identified himself as the base commander.
Two other current SAS members are expected to appear as witnesses during the case. They will give their evidence from behind a screen and recording of their voices was prohibited to conceal their identities.
At the end of the case the jury will decide whether the case amounts to defamation and if so, how much should be awarded.
3 News
Colonel Chris Parsons during cross-examination in court

Colonel Chris Parsons during cross-examination in court

An internal email from a top Defence Force Colonel suggests a statement denying a journalist interviewed an Afghan colonel was needed in order to damage the journalist's credibility and stop an inquiry into revelations he made.
Freelance journalist Jon Stephenson is taking the Defence Force and chief of defence Lieutenant General Rhys Jones to court alleging defamation.
The case began on Monday at the Wellington High Court before Justice Alan MacKenzie and a jury. It is expected to finish next week.
During cross-examination of Colonel Chris Parsons, Mr Stephenson’s lawyer Davey Salmon read an excerpt from an email exchange between Colonel Jim Blackwell, Col Parsons and others.
Part of an email from Col Blackwell read: "Get the statement saying he has not done an interview, get it witnessed by someone with credibility outside NZDF.
"The more that we can prove that [Jon Stephenson's] statements continue to be false, then the earlier we can stop parties requesting an inquiry."
However, Col Parsons said the email did not contain a command or order from Col Blackwell.
"So when he's saying we need to stop an inquiry, he is saying 'we want to reduce the credibility of Jon Stephenson's overall message by claiming he didn't go to the CRU base'," Mr Salmon proposed.
Col Parsons agreed the emails could be interpreted that way.
Mr Stephenson wrote a report in a 2011 edition of Metro magazine claiming the Defence Force was complicit in handing over detainees to Afghan authorities who later tortured the prisoners.
At the heart of the case is a small passage in the 12-page article which says Mr Stephenson visited the crisis response unit (CRU) base in Afghanistan and spoke to a man referred as "Colonel M".
Shortly after it was published, Lt Gen Jones and the Defence Force slammed the article, saying parts of the article were inaccurate or did not happen.
Among the Defence Force's accusations was a claim the interview with "Col M" was made up.
A senior member of the SAS, who also gave evidence yesterday, said it was "very doubtful" Mr Stephenson was allowed to access the CRU base; because of strict security measures.
Identified in court only as Lieutenant Colonel R, he said the CRU base had a strict policy about media access.
On Wednesday Lt Gen Jones, following evidence given by Mr Stephenson, conceded Mr Stephenson "probably" did go to the base and the person he spoke to could have been "Col M". However, Lt Col R did not agree with Lt Gen Jones’ view.
"I have first-hand knowledge of that base and that commander. I maintain my conclusion that visit did not occur."
He did not have any theories about who Mr Stephenson talked to at the base. Mr Stephenson said the man he interviewed, through an interpreter, identified himself as the base commander.
Two other current SAS members are expected to appear as witnesses during the case. They will give their evidence from behind a screen and recording of their voices was prohibited to conceal their identities.
At the end of the case the jury will decide whether the case amounts to defamation and if so, how much should be awarded.
3 News
Fri, 12 Jul 2013 5:00a.m

Monday, July 1, 2013

Party responsible for loss – Sharples

Online Reporter
Maori Party co-leader Pita Sharples says the Maori Party is responsible for its poor showing in the Ikaroa-Rawhiti by-election.
The big upset in the by-election belonged to his party, who placed third behind Mana.
It came second behind Labour candidate Parekura Horomia in the 2011 general election.
Maori Party candidate Na Raihania garnered 2104 of the 10,519 regular votes compared to Mana candidate Te Hamua Nikora's 2607.
Labour's Meka Whaitiri won the election with a 1761 vote majority.
Ms Whaitiri said she was "humbled" by the support of both her party and the voters.
She told The Nation there was "a lot of hurt" within the electorate and housing and jobs were the biggest issues.
Mr Sharples told The Nation there were several reasons behind the party's low vote numbers, including the leadership challenge by Te Ururoa Flavell and the popularity of Mana's candidate.
There was "no doubt" the party suffered from the leadership issues, he said.
"This is the feeling that's been communicated to me around the areas [of Ikaroa-Rawhiti] […] We have to come to terms with that and deal with it."
"It's about settling the issue, really. Both the parliamentary group as well as the party hierarchy have to talk this through together."
He also attributed their poor result to the popularity of Mr Nikora - a television personality known for his work on Maori TV's Kai Time on the Road and Homai te Pakipaki.
"Hamua's a personality. He comes into all our homes and brings entertainment and things like this and we like him. He's someone people can relate to. That was a personality one, I think."
He ruled out joining the Maori Party and Mana, despite a situation where if they had joined they would have won the by-election.
However, Mr Sharples did not think the party's relationship with the National Party was the issue.
"I see it as our party having to get their act into gear, their structure right, the infrastructure in place and moving out amongst the people so they can be aware of how Parliament operates and how you get rewards for your people."
Maori Party loss "embarrassing"
Labour Party leader David Shearer said the Maori Party is "sinking and fast" and described the party's drop from second to third in the result "very embarrassing".
He blamed the result on the party's relationship with National.
"The death knell of this result was John Key associating himself with the Maori party, endorsing them and getting the name of their candidate wrong."
Voters would become disillusioned with the party because of that relationship, he said.
"Five young women that I met on the street said 'the Maori Party says they're at the table, but they're nowhere near the table – they're getting the crumbs off the table.'"
He believed the Greens would not be a threat in the Maori seats and the Maori Party would "disappear" meaning Labour would "have a much clearer run".
Mr Shearer said the party would contest the Maori seats "really heavily" and was confident it would win two more of the Maori seats "if not, the whole lot".
Labour's win in the by-election was never in doubt, he said.
"I think we always knew that we would win, but we didn't want to be too cocky about it. We wanted to get out on the street and work hard and make it a good win.
"When you look at what we’ve done here is we've taken someone who four weeks ago was unknown to anyone and has taken her through to get a result that was as good as Parekura [Horomia]'s result in 2008."
Meanwhile Green Party co-leader Metiria Turei said the result should worry Mr Key.
"He is seeing his support parties across the board start to flail […] that does pose real difficulties for John Key at the next election. So I think we're looking very seriously at a progressive government after the next election and the Green Party wants to be part of that."
The Greens' candidate Marama Davidson was not far behind the Maori Party and managed to garner 1188 votes.
It was the first time the Green Party had campaigned for the seat and Ms Turei said she was happy with the result.
Maori Party result not good for National either
Political commentator Colin James said the result wasn't good for the National Party either.
"The Maori Party is the National Party's proxy in this election and in the Maori electorates generally."
Mr James said the problem with the Maori Party is that it is seen as being "shacked up" with National.
The beginning of the end for the Maori Party began after the 2011 general election when they lost a seat and also the split with Mana leader Hone Harawira, he said.
"This Maori Party has lost its connection with the socio-economic interest of its electors."  
He said Mana was more on the left than the Maori Party is seen to be now.
3 News

Parents sentenced in neglect case

A Lower Hutt couple has been sentenced for neglecting their four children who were found in a house with no food or proper bedding, surrounded by alcohol and needing medical treatment.
The father, 25, was sentenced to six months community detention, 18 months intensive supervision and 80 hours community work. The mother, 22, was sentenced to 18 months intensive supervision and 160 hours community work.
The pair, granted permanent name suppression, was sentenced at the Wellington District Court before Judge Susan Thomas.
Judge Thomas said police were called to the house about 8pm on January 4 after neighbours saw children running onto the road unsupervised. The children were taken into Child, Youth and Family care.
At the house were the parents of the four children, then aged between seven months and four years, as well as members of their extended family, all of whom were drunk. The four children, as well as others, were also at the house.
Police found there was no bedding inside, except for a mattress on the living room floor. There was no furniture and no food, baby formula or baby food in the kitchen. However, there were drug utensils and a "great deal of alcohol", Judge Thomas said.
When police arrived at the house, the father was trying to leave to buy more alcohol. On the same night, the mother, who is the sixth of 18 children, was found to be driving with more than twice the legal limit of alcohol in her system.
Judge Thomas said there was evidence however, that the couple were in the process of moving into the house and bedding had been ordered. But when police returned to the house on January 10, little had changed.
A paediatrician who examined the children said they had lice, infected skin sores and poor hygiene "consistent with physical neglect". One of the children's t-shirts was covered in blood from their skin condition.
"The aggravating factor in this is the breach of trust," Judge Thomas said. "They're totally dependent on you for care, treatment of medical needs and adequate nourishment and you significantly failed them in those areas."
"There may have been some ointment [for the children's skin], but they couldn't have applied it themselves."
The father's lawyer Louise Brown said her client should not be seen as the lead offender because he had not seen the children for about a month.
However Judge Thomas refuted this, saying he was still a parent who has responsibilities. She said she saw no difference between the culpability of the mother and father.
Ms Brown said the father had not had positive role models growing up, and although he had ideals of what parenting should be, he did not know how to achieve them.
She advocated for a community detention sentence because home detention would not allow her client to attend the numerous parenting and budgeting courses under the supervision order.
The mother's lawyer Kerry O'Brien said his client's 12 days in custody following the initial arrest should be taken into account. She had been assessed as having a low risk of reoffending.
The couple admitted four charges each of neglect, one for each child, at a previous court appearance in May.
3 News